Steven, I responded to your comments in thread #4 of this series, so going backward chronologically, but given your two posts, it would seem you and I are very much on the same page.

I have literally read scripts by writers whose ‘stories’ had nothing to them, no soul, no spice, nothing original, and frankly didn’t even work as a story. And had their response to my critique been to say, “But I have all 40 STC story beats!”

It’s such a reductive way of thinking about Story.

Here’s where I think the real problem lies: There is a kind of magic involved in the writing of any good script. And one can’t quantify magic. But one *can* quantify plot points, act breaks, etc. So the average Joe Aspiring Screenwriter, flummoxed by the vicissitudes of creative magic, will embrace *any* approach which claims to provide a quantifiable paradigm or process to writing a successful screenplay.

It reduces the creative act of writing to widgets.

“Purposeful structure” is an interesting counter-phrase and I like that because — to me — it suggests that the writer has engaged their characters in story prep because where does the purpose derive from? The characters and their goals.

Thanks again for your observations. Strong takes.

Written by

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store